Question to the EC: Premium-rate telephone lines and consumer protection

Question to the EC: Premium-rate telephone lines and consumer protection

  • Thursday, 30 April 2020

  •   A+  A-

See Francisco Guerreiro’s question to the European Commission and the written answer on premium-rate telephone lines and consumer protection.

Subject: Premium-rate telephone lines and consumer protection 

Across the Member States, public and private entities provide certain services through premium-rate telephone lines, for which higher prices than normal are charged.

These entities profit from these lines by luring uninformed elderly people, adults and children to call the line to, for example, obtain psychological help, play games, view pornographic content, participate in contests or even contact public services. 

In many cases, these are legal fraud schemes where there is a lack of transparency regarding the conditions applied to the calls. In general, there is also a lack of transparency regarding the profit generated through these premium-rate lines across the EU.

 

1. Could the Commission clarify if the Consumer Rights Directive (1) (or other legislation) provides for any consumer protection in this field? 

2. If so, how has it been monitoring the transposition of the respective legislation into national law and the Member States’ compliance? What measures does the directive provide for to assure full transparency? 

3. What documents are available for public consultation to serve this purpose, and, given the need to better understand this business and protect consumers, does the Commission intend to carry out a study on the profitability of premium-rate lines across the EU? 

(1)       Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights.

 

Answer in writing

 

Directive 2011/83/EU(1) addresses the rate for phone calls only with respect to communication by telephone in relation to the contract concluded between the trader and the consumer, such as for making a complaint. In those cases, the consumer must not be required to pay more than the basic rate. More generally, by complementing sector-specific regulations, national competent authorities can apply Directive 2005/29/EC(2) on unfair commercial practices to prohibit misleading information by traders to consumers about the applicable premium rates for calls.

Specific consumer protection rules in this area are provided by the EU telecom legislation(3) in particular Article 28 of the Universal Service Directive (USD) ensures that relevant authorities are able to block, on a case-by case basis, access to numbers or services where this is justified by reasons of fraud or misuse. Under Article 29 and Annex I part A point b, national regulatory authorities are able to require providers to make available additional facilities such as selective barring for outgoing calls or premium SMS or MMS, or, where technically feasible, other similar kinds of applications, free of charge. 

The EU consumer protection legislation referred to above, including Directives 2011/83/EU and 2005/29/EC, is transposed into national law. Member States’ competent authorities are responsible for ensuring that traders comply with the rules, including addressing any infringements. The Commission reported on the application of Directive 2011/83/EU in 2017(4).

 

(1)       Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, (OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64), see in particular Article 21.

(2)       Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 22).

(3)       Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive).

(4)       https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?item_id=59332


Share this post

To read also...

Guerreiro wants to avoid misleading use of the term “natural” on food products
  • Geral
  • Guerreiro wants to avoid misleading use of the term “natural” on food products

    Wednesday, 10 February 2021
    Under the initiative of MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA), MEPs want to avoid the misleading use of the term “natural” on food products and ask the European Commission to provide a clear definition of “natural” in the European Union’s food legislation.
    READ MORE
    Designer wanted! Are you up to the challenge?
  • Geral
  • Designer wanted! Are you up to the challenge?

    Wednesday, 06 January 2021
    We started the year with the search for a freelancer for a unique and paid service to improve the visual communication of my/our work in the European Parliament. All details on how to apply here.
    READ MORE
    Francisco Guerreiro: 'Without EU help, Portugal would have trouble obtaining vaccines for everyone'
  • Geral
  • Francisco Guerreiro: 'Without EU help, Portugal would have trouble obtaining vaccines for everyone'

    Tuesday, 05 January 2021
    MEP Francisco Guerreiro wants to know how much the European Commission invested in each Member State and how much Portugal saved in the acquisition of vaccines against Covid-19.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: EC/Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: extension of the Protocol
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: EC/Mauritania Fisheries Partnership Agreement: extension of the Protocol

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: Conclusion of the EU-Japan Civil Aviation Safety Agreement
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: Conclusion of the EU-Japan Civil Aviation Safety Agreement

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    Brussels, 17 december 2020 - See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Convention area
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: Management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Convention area

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    Brussels, 17 december 2020 - See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: European Year of Rail
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: European Year of Rail

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: MFF, Rule of Law Conditionality and Own Resources
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: MFF, Rule of Law Conditionality and Own Resources

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    Brussels, 17 december 2020 - See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how the MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE
    Plenary Session: A new strategy for European SMEs
  • Geral
  • Plenary Session: A new strategy for European SMEs

    Thursday, 17 December 2020
    See below what was discussed in this plenary session (14 to 17 december 2020) and how MEP Francisco Guerreiro (Greens/EFA) voted.
    READ MORE

    MORE POSTS

    Can’t find what you’re looking for?